Free audit
The AI verdict, the questions your buyers actually ask an assistant (read from your site), and one live measurement of them across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.
Run a free snapshot to see what the result means now, which page to ship first, and where buyers still need clearer pricing, proof, and comparisons before AI can recommend you confidently.
The AI verdict, the questions your buyers actually ask an assistant (read from your site), and one live measurement of them across ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.
Question by question: where the models recommend you, where they recommend a competitor, and where nobody answers well. The empty ones are what to write next.
The snapshot is free. The report is the plan: which pages to publish first, in what order, what to verify, and what should move in 14 days. One payment, no subscription.
Current snapshot
—
AI verdict
This snapshot estimates readiness from category clarity, competitor set, and brand signals. Add API keys to enable provider checks and reduce guesswork.
The main gap is not more prompts. It is turning your brand into an easier choice on comparisons, proof, and fit questions.
The product is still hard to classify and trust from the current inputs, so broad category prompts will be unstable until the basics are clearer.
This snapshot is using the local scoring layer only. Treat it as directional until provider checks are enabled. This ran without a location, so it measures the category as a whole. If the business serves one city or region, re-run with it: the prompts, the competitors and the actions all change.
First page to ship
What is your brand and who is it for
Do next
Pages to line up next
What to expect
Expect clearer answers on "your brand" comparison prompts after the first two decision-stage pages go live.
What to expect
Expect less provider disagreement once proof and fit are explicit on-page.
What to expect
Do not expect broad "best in category" wins first. Expect easier branded and mid-intent recommendation paths before category leadership.
best your category
which your category should I choose
recommended your category
your category alternatives
what is your brand
your brand reviews
compare your brand vs competitors
The questions your buyer asks an assistant, the answer they get back, and where your brand sits in it.
GEO is the practice of making your brand more likely to be surfaced, cited, and recommended when people ask AI assistants and AI search about your category. Instead of ranking blue links, you optimize the site evidence and context that language models draw on when they generate an answer.
Traditional SEO targets a ranked list of links on a results page. GEO targets the single synthesized answer an AI assistant gives, where there are no ten blue links — only whether your brand is named. It rewards clear, structured, quotable evidence over keyword density and backlinks.
AEO is optimizing to be the direct answer an engine returns, rather than one of many results. In practice it overlaps heavily with GEO: both aim to get your brand cited inside AI-generated answers on ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and AI Overviews instead of buried in a link list.
Each audit queries your buyer-intent prompts against OpenAI, Google Gemini, and Claude. We report how consistently your brand appears across repeated runs, so you see a confidence signal rather than a single non-deterministic answer that could change on the next request.
Yes. The free snapshot audit shows how likely your brand is to surface when buyers ask AI assistants about your category, which competitors get cited instead, and which decision pages are missing. No credit card is required — it is a lead magnet, not a trial.